UNITED STATES ARMY WAR COLLEGE
STRATEGIC STUDIES INSTITUTE
Authored by Mr. Sarwar A. Kashmeri.
Published July 21, 2011
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »
UNITED STATES ARMY WAR COLLEGE
STRATEGIC STUDIES INSTITUTE
Authored by Mr. Sarwar A. Kashmeri.
Published July 21, 2011
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »
The besieged Libyan city of Misrata has become a killing field. Civilians by the hundreds are being killed in this densely populated city of 550,000 by Qaddafi forces. NATO’s aircraft are ineffective in this urban environment.
There is only one solution to Misrata’s plight: the immediate deployment of a military force to break the siege. Fortunately such a force is now ready to be inserted in Libya, it is the European Union’s recently approved EUFOR Libya, a battalion size (1100) force of European troops ready to deploy in Libya as soon as the United Nation requests it.
A force on the ground in Misrata would consolidate these fragile rebel gains, secure the port, open up a lifeline for supplies to come in and civilians to depart and so ensure that this Eastern-most advance of the Qaddafi forces is not repeated again. An organized military presence would also add intelligence on the ground to make NATO warplanes more effective going forward.
It is time the U.S.urged the UN to make this 911 call to put European boots on the ground in Libya.
__________________
EUFOR Libya
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »
EUROPEAN GEOSTRATEGY
op ed 15:39, 27 April 2011
Even before the onset of hostilities in Libya it was obvious to insiders on both sides of the Atlantic that NATO was increasingly dysfunctional. Libya has now shown the wider public that the emperor has no clothes.
Cohesion used to be NATO’s trademark, but there is little of that left. And the reputation of the ‘greatest military alliance’ is a diminishing commodity for younger American military officers as I recently found out during a visit to a United Sates Navy aircraft carrier. During dinner I was seated between the ship’s two senior officers. The older Executive Officer felt NATO was the cornerstone of Western defence, while the younger commander of the ship’s attack squadrons told me it still had to be proven to him that NATO was still useful. <read full op ed on European Geostrategy>
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »
Two Libya/NATO related headlines caught my eye today:
And
…Technically, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization operates only in the wake of an attack on a NATO member. The war in Afghanistan followed such an attack and was, in the beginning, widely perceived as a war against a common enemy. Libya is different: There was no attack, there is no common enemy, and now there is no consensus…
MY TAKE: Not only is there little consensus within NATO on what it is doing in Libya, the economic recession has bottled up the alliance’s effectiveness. It is not well known that each NATO member pays for its military operation in NATO missions. The Alliance itself has no funds or military assets to fight wars. In Libya, the UK and France (and whatever other countries have agreed to contribute to the war plan, and only a handful of NATO members have) pay for their military contribution out of their national treasury. As they have been doing in Afghanistan for a decade now. Not long ago the Prime Minister of Poland showed up at NATO headquarters to bemoan the country’s expenses in Afghanistan that total $1bn per year, fully one-tenth of Poland’s entire defense budget.
The United States spent upwards of $600 million in the first week of the Libyan war, now it expects to spend around $40 million over three weeks, at most. So who picks up the slack? Mainly France and Britain. No wonder the two would like other NATO members to step up to the plate.
Here’s an idea. NATO is busy building itself a new billion plus dollar headquarters outside Brussels. Maybe it could shelve the plan, donate the money to all those countries that can’t afford to join in NATO’s war in Libya and help poor France and Britain from going broke fighting…and save the poor American taxpayers from ultimately footing another war bill.
scale model of NATO HQ
###
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Anne Applebaum, Applebaum, NATO rift | Leave a comment »
“… brilliant analysis …” James F. Hoge, Jr., Counselor, Council on Foreign Relations, New York; “…NATO has long since lost its bearings… [to get] things back on track, Sarwar Kashmeri provides a detailed and eminently sensible road map.” Prof.Andy Bacevich, Boston University; “…a meticulously researched, wise, and lucid book…” Prof. Rajan Menon, City College NY/City Univ. NY;”…provides extraordinary insights into NATO and the future of the transatlantic alliance…” Noel Lateef, Pres & CEO, Foreign Policy Association
Based on original research and conversations with over 40 North American & European leaders, including:
Bantz J. Craddock, General (Ret) former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), Brent Scowcroft, General, former National Security Advisor, CEO, The Scowcroft Group, Christopher J.R. Davis, Lt. General, CMM, CD Canadian Military Representative to NATO,Ersin Onunduran, Professor of International Relations, Ankara University, Turkey, Hakan Syren, General, Chairman, European Union Military Committee (Brussels), Karl-Heinz Lather, General, DEU Army, Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers in Europe, NATO (Mons, Belgium), Stephane Abrial, General, Supreme Allied Commander for Transformation, NATO…(Full list here)
Filed under: Uncategorized | Comments Off on “…provides extraordinary insights into NATO…”
A once-great alliance, NATO has long since lost its bearings. For anyone concerned with getting things back on track, Sarwar Kashmeri provides a detailed and eminently sensible road map
— Andrew J. Bacevich, professor of history and international relations, Boston University, and author of Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War (2010)
This brilliant analysis leaves no doubt that diminished resources, sheer neglect, and strategic differences among NATO’s partners have weakened this long-standing pillar of Western defense. Sarwar Kashmeri urges the United States and the European Union to align their thinking and combine their resources to ensure that the ‘world’s most successful military alliance’ will live on
—James F. Hoge, Jr., counselor, Council on Foreign Relations
This book provides extraordinary insights into NATO and the future of the transatlantic alliance. Every person concerned with the future of this vital alliance has much to learn from Sarwar Kashmeri’s highly readable and compelling analysis
—Noel V. Lateef, president and CEO, Foreign Policy Association
Sarwar Kashmeri’s views on the Atlantic alliance are widely respected, and NATO 2.0 demonstrates why. It is a meticulously researched, wise, and lucid book that is enriched by Kashmeri’s wide-ranging interviews with American and European leaders (past and present) and foreign policy experts. Kashmeri does not pull punches in discussing the serious problems NATO faces in developing a compelling raison d’être in the 21st century, but he also points the way forward by offering creative proposals for cooperation between the alliance and the European Union through the latter’s European Security and Defense Policy. Those who believe that NATO still has a purpose would do well to read his impressive book
—Rajan Menon, Anne and Bernard Spitzer Chair in Political Science, City College of New York/City University of New York and author of The End of Alliances (2007)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Andrew Bacevich, Bacevich, Boston University, Council on Foreign Relations, Foreign Policy Association, James Hoge, NATO, NATO 2.0, Noel Lateef, Rajan Menon, Sarwar Kashmeri | Leave a comment »